Logo

Site Related : CarDatabase.net
This is the support forum. Ask your site related questions or give your comments here.
Goto Thread: PreviousNext
Goto: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In
rejection: 18?
Posted by: juanelo242 (IP Logged)
Date: June 3, 2008 09:15AM

.. .... ..



Edited 1 times. Last edit at 06/04/08 11:40PM by juanelo242.

Re: rejection: 18?
Posted by: admin (IP Logged)
Date: June 3, 2008 03:03PM

Where's that from??

Henrik

Re: rejection: 18?
Posted by: juanelo242 (IP Logged)
Date: June 3, 2008 08:04PM

When i log in in "my photos" then there'sa link "my rejections"
then says "View 20 rejections instead of 10" then a list of photographers with numbers, i had 18. But now i see they rejected 2 photos:

HOW THE HELL THIS iS BAD ANGLE!!


if you reject this one (i mean corsa) for bad angle, why accepted this?
The corsa's pic is far more interesting than the fiat

CarDatabase.net:
Click here for bigger photo!
Photographer © RauL


Re: rejection: 18?
Posted by: Felipe Garcia (IP Logged)
Date: June 3, 2008 08:44PM

I've gotten some rejections like that thare just due to an apparent bad angle caused by the perspective.

Felipe Garcia




Re: rejection: 18?
Posted by: Mårten (IP Logged)
Date: June 3, 2008 09:11PM

well, for the first, the Fiat pic at least shows the whole car...


Re: rejection: 18?
Posted by: jojo cence (IP Logged)
Date: June 4, 2008 12:55AM

no perspective problem, this is bad angle, look at the pool. Not my rejection but i agree with this one

Re: rejection: 18?
Posted by: Felipe Garcia (IP Logged)
Date: June 4, 2008 01:18AM

Yes, there is a minimal angle when you see the pole, the point that I have been trying to bring up for ages is that in many countries outside the US, Canada and the EU those things can't be used to define whether it is leveled or not.

Look at this

CarDatabase.net:
Click here for bigger photo!
Photographer © Felipe Garcia



Which pole are you using to say if it is leveled or not? what if you give a bad angle because of a nearby pole that isn't leveled? we aren't shooting in places that conform to international standards of any sort. Except for the airports, the cities aren't built to perfection, I already posted a pic where you can see how even a street is.

Felipe Garcia




Re: rejection: 18?
Posted by: juanelo242 (IP Logged)
Date: June 4, 2008 11:37PM

Nevermind, i still think it's an unfair reject.
For me is hard to understand what is rejectable or acceptable.

What do you think if we'd show pics from CDB, not yours, that you think are rejectable but made it anyway? So we'll have an idea of what is rejectable.



Edited 1 times. Last edit at 06/04/08 11:38PM by juanelo242.

Re: rejection: 18?
Posted by: Felipe Garcia (IP Logged)
Date: June 4, 2008 11:59PM

It's just very subjective, and bad angles are kinda new.

Felipe Garcia




Re: rejection: 18?
Posted by: admin (IP Logged)
Date: June 5, 2008 02:49PM

Hi,

Most of the rejections are new, and one screener is new as well. We never had to discuss screening standards due to the few screeners, but as the site grows this will become a more and more important issue.

I will try to add the tools and documentation needed for all photographers to be able to understand how we would like the photos to be prepared to be accepted.

Regards,
Henrik

Re: rejection: 18?
Posted by: Felipe Garcia (IP Logged)
Date: June 5, 2008 05:00PM

What about making an "ask the screener" forum, where we can ask for comments before uploading or for a small explanation/help after rejection?

Felipe Garcia




Re: rejection: 18?
Posted by: Nicholas (IP Logged)
Date: July 1, 2008 02:55AM

I agree on that one, or how about if its hard to decided weather it should be accepted, why not have a page/section where its voted on by the Registered Members?
Or the Regulars so that's like 10-15 of us I guess?

-Nicholas

Re: rejection: 18?
Posted by: admin (IP Logged)
Date: July 8, 2008 07:36PM

Sounds like some old plans we had for other sites... Definitely worth looking into. It will definitely speed up screening quite a bit if it works out well.

Regards,
Henrik

Re: rejection: 18?
Posted by: Nicholas (IP Logged)
Date: September 1, 2008 08:46AM

is this idea going to been put down and going through ?

-Nicholas

Re: rejection: 18?
Posted by: admin (IP Logged)
Date: November 8, 2008 11:50AM

Working on a such a general system to be used for cdb as well.

Regards,
Henrik



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

[Home] [Forum] [News] [Sport news]
[Market] [Techspec preview] [Add photos]
[WAP] [Contact] [About] [Privacy Policy]